A shocking new report by Hollywood Life says that Jen might be expecting? Is there really a fourth baby coming in for Jennifer Garner and Ben Affleck despite the divorce? According to the article based on In Touch Magazine's sources, Jen is in the "early stages of her pregnancy" and that "Jen was shocked when she found out about the pregnancy."
According to the article by Hollywood Life, Garner really wants to have a "fourth child" even before but then his ex-husband Affleck just wants three and that he thinks that would be enough.
Their sources said, "Jen wanted a fourth child, but Ben put the kibosh on that last year. He said three was enough."
But the thought of the fourth child may also mean a chance for reunion between the two and this would be a chance for Affleck to have Garner rethink about their relationship. Their sources also said, "Ben is thrilled at the thought of another child. He sees it as an insurance policy that Jen will give a permanent reunion serious thought."
As reported months back by US Weekly, the "Batman vs Superman" actor really wants to start anew with Jen and even "begs" for this second chance for him to be with her and the children.
It was said that "Ben is ready to commit totally to Jen and fall in line as a faithful and dedicated family man. But they have a long way to go."
The 43-year-old "Alias" actress is reportedly still "committed to going through with the divorce, at least up until the past few weeks."
But despite this shocking news between Garner and Affleck, Gossip Cop clears this report otherwise and their sources say there is "No baby" and "No Reunion" happening with the ex-couple.
In their article, they clearly state that "Affleck and Garner are NOT reconciling, but maintaining a friendship out of mutual respect and concern for their three children. There is NOT, however, a fourth child on the way." Gossip Cop said that they got this scoop exclusively from "The Alias" actress' rep.
Pregnant or not, we hope that there will be positive outcome between the ex-couples for the sake of their lovely three children. What do you think about this issue?
